One NSA Analyst Used the Most Powerful Spy Tool in America to Stalk a Tinder Match

April 16, 2026 Big Government, Cat2
Creativan via shutterstock

The federal government built Section 702 to hunt terrorists and foreign spies.

But an NSA analyst used it to dig up personal information on someone they met on a dating app.

And three years later, nobody has told the American public whether that analyst faced a single consequence.

Boebert Demands the NSA Explain Why Nobody Was Fired for Warrantless Spying

Rep. Lauren Boebert sent a letter Monday to NSA Director Joshua Rudd demanding accountability for what the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board confirmed in its September 2023 report – NSA analysts ran unauthorized surveillance queries on people they met through an online dating service.

Not foreign operatives.

Not suspected terrorists.

People they matched with online.

It gets worse.

Two additional NSA analysts queried a non-U.S. person who was a potential tenant for a rental property – using the same classified surveillance system built to monitor America's most dangerous foreign adversaries.

Section 702 is one of the most powerful intelligence tools the U.S. government possesses.

It allows the NSA to collect the communications of foreign targets – emails, texts, calls – without a warrant.

The problem is that Americans' private communications get swept up in that collection constantly.

And instead of treating that incidental collection as a sacred responsibility, at least three NSA analysts treated it as a personal search engine.

Boebert's letter gives the NSA 10 days to answer six specific demands – including the full disciplinary record for every analyst involved, whether any of them still hold security clearances, and whether any were referred for criminal prosecution.

"The American people deserve to know that abuses of this extraordinary power carry real consequences," she wrote.

Clapper and Brennan Are Pushing Congress to Renew FISA 702 Without a Warrant Requirement

Section 702 expires April 20.

And the people pushing hardest to renew it without any reforms include James Clapper – the former Director of National Intelligence who lied to Congress under oath about NSA surveillance – and John Brennan, the former CIA Director who spent four years on MSNBC calling Trump a Russian asset.

These are the same architects of the surveillance state who now want Congress to hand them the keys again – no warrant requirement, no accountability, no questions asked.

Boebert isn't buying it.

She's demanding that any reauthorization include a warrant requirement for queries targeting Americans – meaning a judge, not an analyst nursing a grudge or a romantic obsession, decides whether to search your communications.

That's not a radical position.

That's the Fourth Amendment.

The FBI Has Run Thousands of Illegal Backdoor Searches and Congress Keeps Looking Away

The PCLOB report wasn't the first time Section 702 abuses made headlines.

The FBI – which also has access to Section 702 databases – racked up thousands of improper queries in the years prior, including searches on January 6 defendants and a sitting U.S. Senator.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court itself rebuked the FBI in 2022 for treating the database like a Google search bar.

What all of these cases share: the analysts ran the searches, the oversight bodies documented the abuses, and the actual consequences imposed on the people who did it remained almost entirely secret.

That's what Boebert is calling out.

A surveillance authority with no real accountability isn't a national security tool.

It's a weapon pointed at Americans, operated by people who know they'll never have to answer for pulling the trigger.

Every Congress that reauthorizes Section 702 without demanding accountability answers is telling those analysts the same thing: go ahead.

The American people deserve better than that – and so does the Constitution they keep swearing to uphold.

Sources:

  • Sean Moran, "Rep. Lauren Boebert Demands Answers for 'Deeply Troubling Abuse of Power' by NSA Analysts," Breitbart, April 13, 2026.
  • Sean Moran, "Deep State Actors Urge Congress to Reauthorize Section 702 Without Reforms," Breitbart, 2026.
  • Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, "Report on the Surveillance Program Operated Pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act," September 2023.
  • Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Opinion and Order re: Government's Proposed Standard Minimization Procedures, November 2022.