Kamala Harris still counts on lawfare as her ace in the hole for November.
And Donald Trump got some bad news on that front.
That’s because a judge tried to hand Kamala Harris the 2024 election with this disgusting ruling.
Judge Chutkan allows Jack Smith to interfere in the 2024 election
The Supreme Court frustrated Obama-appointed Judge Tanya Chutkan and Biden-Harris appointed prosecutor Jack Smith’s scheme to rush a rigged show trial for Trump on charges relating to January 6 before the election with their ruling on Presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for core and official acts.
Since Judge Chutkan can’t hold her kangaroo court trial to convict Trump before Election Day and influence the outcome of the vote, Chutkan did the next best thing.
In a ruling dripping with contempt, Judge Chutkan ruled that Smith could dump a 180-page document outlining the evidence against Trump, which is nothing more than an opposition research hit piece on Kamala Harris’ election opponent produced by the Biden-Harris Justice Department.
“A party’s factual proffer does not conclusively establish anything — it merely provides evidence for the judicial factfinder to consider,” Chutkan ranted. “The schedule reflects the court’s best judgment about how to comply efficiently with the Supreme Court’s instructions on remand.”
Judge Chutkan dismissed the Trump team’s claims about the attempt to meddle in the election while Trump faces a gag order that limits his Constitutional rights.
“The court need not address the substance of those claims,” Judge Chutkan added. “Defendant does not explain how those putative violations cause him legal prejudice in this case, nor how this court is bound by or has jurisdiction to enforce Department of Justice policy.”
Trump’s argument
Justice Department policy prohibits any prosecutorial action on candidates within 60 days of an election.
Trump’s lawyers argued that Smith introducing this massive collection of anti-Trump material for the media to run wild with was “fundamentally unfair.”
The defense also argued that this document “would attempt to set a closed record for addressing unfiled defense motions by crediting their own untested assessments of purported evidence, denying President Trump an opportunity to confront their witnesses, and preventing the defense from obtaining discovery.”
Smith would try his case in the court of public opinion and Trump would be denied a response on two fronts.
First, his legal team wouldn’t be able to test the evidence in court under cross examination.
And second, while Kamala Harris, the Democrats, and the news media could attack Trump over the contents of the document, Trump couldn’t fire back.
That’s because the gag order prevented Trump from commenting on witnesses and their testimony.
In the final 40 days of the election, Kamala Harris could attack Trump as an insurrectionist who tried to end democracy and if Trump defended himself, Chutkan could revoke his bail and throw him in prison.
If this seems fundamentally unfair, that is the point of the lawfare where the Biden-Harris administration stacked the deck in her favor, enlisting Democrat prosecutors to file sham criminal indictments against Trump in courts run by Democrat judges.
