ABC moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir pressed their thumbs down on the scale for Kamala Harris during the debate with Donald Trump.
No one thought this was an accident.
And ABC revealed the secret plan to rig the debate against Donald Trump.
ABC set up Trump for an ambush
Donald Trump debated Kamala Harris and her two deputies when he took the stage in Philadelphia.
Muir and Davis abandoned all pretense of objectivity and served as Kamala Harris’ offensive line by blocking for her with false “fact checks” and arguing with Donald Trump.
But these so-called “fact checks” weren’t spur of the moment decisions by Davis and Muir to correct the record.
Davis and Muir conspired with ABC executives on a premeditated murder of the truth and journalistic fairness to ensure Kamala Harris didn’t meet the same fate as Joe Biden during the June 27 debate.
The liberal media was so pleased with Muir and Davis that the Los Angeles Times published a puff piece about Davis that pulled the curtain back on the plot against Trump.
Stephen Battaglio praised Davis’ so-called “fact checks” as the headline moment of the debate.
“In an era in which misinformation spreads fast and furious, Davis’ real-time fact check cut through the proceedings like a sharp blade,” Battaglio wrote.
Battaglio revealed that Davis and Muir conspired against Trump because they blamed CNN not rigging the June 27 debate for Trump winning and forcing Biden out of the race.
Muir said she and Davis were determined to guarantee that Donald Trump didn’t repeat debate victory, which would drive the final nail in the coffin of Kamala Harris’ campaign.
“Davis, wearing pink glasses while speaking to The Times over breakfast at the Ritz Carlton in Philadelphia, said the decision to attempt to correct the candidates was in response to the June 27 CNN debate between Trump and President Biden, whose poor performance led to his exit from the race,” Battaglio wrote.
“People were concerned that statements were allowed to just hang and not [be] disputed by the candidate Biden, at the time, or the moderators,” Davis explained to Battaglio.
Battaglio detailed how Muir and Davis war gamed out the debate ambush through table reads and film studies so they could map out when they would need to intercede on Kamala Harris’ behalf and undercut Trump.
“In the weeks before the debate, various scenarios were played out in table read-like settings where the anchors and ABC News producers tested their questions and played out the possible responses,” Battaglio continued.
Fake fact checks
Both Muir and Davis ended up influencing the debate by spreading misinformation.
Donald Trump correctly accused Kamala Harris of supporting allowing babies born alive following botched abortion to die.
“There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born,” Davis falsely claimed in response.
In Minnesota, Kamala Harris’ running mate Tim Walz removed the requirement to provide life-saving care to babies born alive.
Eight babies died following failed abortions on Walz’s watch.
Walz’s response was to remove the reporting requirement on those botched abortions so no one knows how many babies were born alive and left to die.
Muir falsely claimed crime was going down when Trump said it shot up on Kamala Harris’ watch.
In fact, crime is up 37 percent since 2020, a year that was artificially high due to the BLM and Antifa riots.
But these so-called “fact checks” influenced the debate and potentially the voters.
And it was all planned ahead of time.
